PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFX vs. GMEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFX vs. GMEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -19.85% return, which is significantly lower than GMEU's -10.68% return.


MSFX

1D
5.74%
1M
37.34%
6M
4.23%
YTD
-19.85%
1Y
-36.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.75%

GMEU

1D
-1.64%
1M
-11.89%
6M
-34.35%
YTD
-10.68%
1Y
-38.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-61.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.41M$2.21M$2.51M
$7.46M$6.03M$5.49M

MSFX vs. GMEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and GMEU is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFX vs. GMEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GMEU
GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSFX vs. GMEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFXGMEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.94

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.69

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-1.01

0.00

MSFX vs. GMEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is comparable to the GMEU Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and GMEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. GMEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.56%, smaller than the maximum GMEU drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and GMEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFXGMEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.56%

-81.07%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.56%

-59.59%

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.33%

-80.20%

+40.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-65.03%

+41.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.70%

40.57%

-1.87%

Volatility

MSFX vs. GMEU - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 29.51% compared to T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) at 13.01%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFXGMEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.51%

13.01%

+16.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.35%

53.03%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.33%

70.63%

-7.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.73%

85.59%

-31.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.73%

85.59%

-31.86%

MSFX vs. GMEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GMEU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFX vs. GMEU - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, while GMEU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFX and GMEU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFX has higher volatility (29.51%) compared to GMEU (13.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -63.56% vs GMEU's -81.07%.

On 1-year performance, MSFX leads with -36.75% vs -38.64% for GMEU. On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, GMEU has been the lower-risk option at 13.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSFX has performed better with a -36.75% return vs -38.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 0.00% for GMEU.

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 1.50% for GMEU.

GMEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFX and GMEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer