MSFX vs. DIG
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSFX is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFX returned -50.30% vs 55.46% for DIG. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
MSFX vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -41.43% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 55.77% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -39.52%
- YTD
- -41.43%
- 1Y
- -50.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 5.98%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- YTD
- 55.77%
- 1Y
- 55.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 30.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.74%
MSFX vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -41.43% | 9.84% | 3.03% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 55.77% | 2.73% | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and DIG is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | -0.01 |
MSFX vs. DIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSFX
DIG
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MSFX
DIG
-
Basic Materials
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Communication Services
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Consumer Defensive
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Energy
MSFX
-
DIG
Financial Services
MSFX
-
DIG
Healthcare
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Industrials
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Real Estate
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Utilities
MSFX
-
DIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
DIG
MSFX vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.22 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.87 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 4.92 | -6.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.56%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.56% | -97.04% | +33.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.56% | -29.80% | -33.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.66% | -54.37% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -64.31% | +41.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.56% | 11.38% | +25.18% |
Volatility
MSFX vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 20.83% compared to ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) at 14.59%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.83% | 14.59% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.82% | 33.43% | +15.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.37% | 42.08% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.22% | 51.49% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.22% | 57.81% | -7.59% |
MSFX vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than DIG's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.59% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 9.12% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and DIG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFX has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to DIG (14.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -63.56% vs DIG's -97.04%.
On 1-year performance, DIG leads with 55.46% vs -50.30% for MSFX. On fees, DIG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DIG has been the lower-risk option at 14.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIG has performed better with a 55.46% return vs -50.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 1.59% for DIG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.95% for DIG.
DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer