MSFX vs. DIG
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSFX is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFX returned -29.20% vs 90.00% for DIG. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
MSFX vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.35% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- -6.67%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- -28.34%
- 6M
- -29.12%
- 1Y
- -29.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 66.35%
- 6M
- 59.45%
- 1Y
- 90.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.32%
MSFX vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -28.34% | 9.84% | 3.81% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.35% | 2.73% | 6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and DIG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between MSFX and DIG shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
DIG
MSFX vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 3.89 | -4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 10.65 | -11.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 2.22 | -2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | -0.00 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.86% | -97.04% | +36.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.86% | -23.29% | -37.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.75% | -51.27% | +5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -64.37% | +43.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.80% | 8.49% | +23.31% |
Volatility
MSFX vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 19.56% compared to ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) at 16.56%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.56% | 16.56% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.26% | 33.14% | +12.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.40% | 40.88% | +9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.33% | 51.59% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.33% | 57.81% | -8.48% |
MSFX vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than DIG's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.50% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 7.45% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and DIG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFX has higher volatility (19.56%) compared to DIG (16.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -60.86% vs DIG's -97.04%.
On 1-year performance, DIG leads with 90.00% vs -29.20% for MSFX. On fees, DIG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DIG has been the lower-risk option at 16.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIG has performed better with a 90.00% return vs -29.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 1.50% for DIG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.95% for DIG.
DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer