MSFW vs. GBIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. MSFW is actively managed, while GBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

MSFW vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.53% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.44% return.

MSFW

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 4.75%
• YTD: -14.53%
• 6M: -14.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	-14.53%	-7.81%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.44%	1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and GBIL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

MSFW vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFW	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.75	4.88	-5.62

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFW	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-0.76%	-39.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.10%	0.00%	-26.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.49%	-0.04%	-17.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFW	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.32%	0.23%	+32.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.32%	0.58%	+31.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.32%	0.47%	+31.85%

MSFW vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFW vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.22%, more than GBIL's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.74%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	39.22%	20.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFW and GBIL in my portfolio?

MSFW and GBIL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFW or GBIL?

On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFW or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFW or GBIL?

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.22%, compared with 3.74% for GBIL.

What is the main difference between MSFW and GBIL?

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while GBIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.12% for GBIL.