PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. ACYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSFW

1D
1.71%
1M
1.75%
6M
-15.87%
YTD
-21.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACYS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.51%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and ACYS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. ACYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and ACYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWACYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-0.63%

-41.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.08%

-0.10%

-31.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.41%

-0.14%

-19.27%

Volatility

MSFW vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWACYSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.58%

3.38%

+30.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.58%

3.38%

+30.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.58%

3.38%

+30.20%

MSFW vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFW vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.07%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and ACYS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 48.07%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.75% for ACYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and ACYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer