MSFU vs. TERG
MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSFU is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFU charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
MSFU vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -27.75% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 229.64% return.
MSFU
- 1D
- -6.29%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -27.75%
- 6M
- -26.97%
- 1Y
- -26.68%
- 3Y*
- -0.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- 39.95%
- YTD
- 229.64%
- 6M
- 218.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFU vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | -27.75% | -10.64% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 229.64% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFU and TERG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFU vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
MSFU
TERG
MSFU vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 9.90 | -9.70 |
Drawdowns
MSFU vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -49.52% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.08% | -15.98% | -28.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -13.73% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.95% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFU vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.14% | 139.25% | -89.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.32% | 139.25% | -92.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.32% | 139.25% | -92.93% |
MSFU vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFU vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | 10.95% | 8.15% | 7.00% | 2.11% | 0.54% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFU and TERG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.
MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.95%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for MSFU and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer