MSFU vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. MSFU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFU charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

MSFU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -22.90% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 508.11% return.

MSFU

• 1D: -8.36%
• 1M: 12.13%
• YTD: -22.90%
• 6M: -25.88%
• 1Y: -21.45%
• 3Y*: 1.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 9.92%
• YTD: 508.11%
• 6M: 330.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	-22.90%	-2.78%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	508.11%	5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and LINT is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.00

MSFU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFU	LINT
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSFU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU

MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	20.86	-20.62

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.83%	-49.54%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.32%	-32.61%	-7.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-20.47%	+3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.49%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.77%	163.37%	-113.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.23%	163.37%	-117.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.23%	163.37%	-117.14%

MSFU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than LINT's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.14%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	10.26%	8.15%	7.00%	2.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFU and LINT in my portfolio?

MSFU and LINT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFU or LINT?

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 0.14% for LINT.

What is the main difference between MSFU and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 0.97% for LINT.