MSFU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. MSFU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSFU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

MSFU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -18.87% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

MSFU

• 1D: 5.90%
• 1M: 37.88%
• 6M: 4.85%
• YTD: -18.87%
• 1Y: -34.49%
• 3Y*: 3.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.80%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	$236.35M	$210.49M	$216.20M

MSFU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	-18.87%	-5.56%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and LINT is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.07

MSFU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFU	LINT
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSFU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSFU

MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSFU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	—	—

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -62.43%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.43%	-69.02%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.20%	-62.88%	+25.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	-23.85%	+5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.22%	169.51%	-106.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.57%	169.51%	-119.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.57%	169.51%	-119.94%

MSFU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than LINT's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	9.13%	8.15%	7.00%	2.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFU and LINT in my portfolio?

MSFU and LINT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for MSFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFU or LINT?

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 0.76% for LINT.

What is the main difference between MSFU and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 0.98% for MSFU and 0.97% for LINT.