MSFT vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 23.48%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -26.72% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 23.48%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.

MSFT

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: -15.19%
• YTD: -26.72%
• 6M: -27.38%
• 1Y: -27.75%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 23.48%

GCOW

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 7.11%
• 1Y: 22.04%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-26.72%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	42.53%	57.56%	20.80%	40.73%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	7.36%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and GCOW is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016	0.37

The correlation between MSFT and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 7
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 70
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFT	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	2.00	-3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.42	2.86	-4.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.35	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	2.99	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.60	10.37	-11.97

MSFT vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-37.64%	-31.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.50%	-7.40%	-27.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.50%	-12.35%	-22.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.15%	-21.48%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.15%	-37.64%	+0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.50%	-6.91%	-27.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.79%	-5.83%	-15.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.34%	2.13%	+15.21%

Volatility

MSFT vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.99%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.82%	2.99%	+8.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.26%	8.32%	+14.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.24%	11.11%	+15.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.85%	13.51%	+13.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.11%	16.03%	+11.08%

Dividends

MSFT vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.90%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	1.01%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFT and GCOW in my portfolio?

MSFT and GCOW have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFT or GCOW?

MSFT has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to GCOW (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.