PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD, while CRDO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRDO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.NEO achieves a -17.91% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 83.82% return.


MSFT.NEO

1D
2.25%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-17.91%
6M
-16.55%
1Y
-17.17%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
10Y*

CRDO

1D
3.36%
1M
53.30%
YTD
83.82%
6M
85.26%
1Y
262.52%
3Y*
147.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
-17.91%12.61%11.26%56.34%-19.76%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
83.82%104.32%274.43%42.80%17.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and CRDO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.37

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and CRDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSFT.NEO:

CA$209.09B

CRDO:

$49.98B

EPS

MSFT.NEO:

$14.11

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

1.43

CRDO:

103.94

PS Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

0.51

CRDO:

36.77

PB Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

0.41

CRDO:

24.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT.NEO:

$293.81B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT.NEO:

$202.04B

CRDO:

$908.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.NEO
MSFT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFT.NEOCRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.37

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

4.91

-5.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

11.66

-12.66

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.NEO and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum CRDO drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.NEO and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT.NEOCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-61.76%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-53.82%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-61.76%

+27.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.08%

-1.90%

-25.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-18.90%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.18%

22.63%

-5.45%

Volatility

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) is 10.69%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 27.93%. This indicates that MSFT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT.NEOCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

27.93%

-17.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

64.97%

-42.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.27%

85.57%

-60.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.17%

81.80%

-54.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

81.80%

-54.63%

Dividends

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
0.89%0.70%0.73%0.75%1.07%0.19%

Financials

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corp CDR and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
77.67B
437.00M
(MSFT.NEO) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSFT.NEO vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microsoft Corp CDR and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
69.1%
68.2%
Portfolio components
MSFT.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a gross profit of 53.63B and revenue of 77.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

MSFT.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported an operating income of 37.96B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

MSFT.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a net income of 27.75B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT.NEO and CRDO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT.NEO and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer