PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.NEO achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -12.10% return.


MSFT.NEO

1D
-2.65%
1M
0.63%
YTD
-14.38%
6M
-14.51%
1Y
-12.53%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-2.45%
1M
3.12%
YTD
-12.10%
6M
-12.61%
1Y
-8.46%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
25.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
-14.38%12.61%11.26%56.34%-29.26%16.37%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-12.10%10.28%22.63%54.71%-22.90%17.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and MSFT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021

0.91

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and MSFT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSFT.NEO:

CA$218.09B

MSFT:

$3.10T

EPS

MSFT.NEO:

CA$14.11

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

2.08

MSFT:

24.82

PS Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

0.74

MSFT:

9.76

PB Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

0.60

MSFT:

7.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT.NEO:

CA$293.81B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT.NEO:

CA$202.04B

MSFT:

$217.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.NEO
MSFT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFT.NEOMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.96

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.25

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

-0.50

-0.25

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.NEO and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFT.NEOMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

-0.34

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.90

-0.64

Drawdowns

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.NEO and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT.NEOMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-34.17%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-34.17%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-34.17%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.95%

-22.69%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-7.54%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.66%

16.80%

-0.14%

Volatility

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 10.28% and 10.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT.NEOMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

10.16%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.22%

22.25%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

25.10%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.19%

25.48%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

25.96%

+1.23%

Dividends

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than MSFT's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.85%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
0.86%0.70%0.73%0.75%1.07%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corp CDR and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
77.67B
82.89B
(MSFT.NEO) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSFT.NEO values in CAD, MSFT values in USD

MSFT.NEO vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microsoft Corp CDR and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

67.0%68.0%69.0%70.0%71.0%20222023202420252026
69.1%
67.6%
Portfolio components
MSFT.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a gross profit of 53.63B and revenue of 77.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

MSFT.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported an operating income of 37.96B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

MSFT.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a net income of 27.75B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MSFT.NEO and MSFT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT.NEO and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer