MSFT.NEO vs. IOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO).
IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000.
Performance
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT.NEO Microsoft Corp CDR | -23.81% | 12.97% | 11.57% | 56.83% | -29.06% | 16.15% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | -3.21% | 21.19% | 37.41% | 24.89% | -10.38% | 10.08% |
Different Trading Currencies
MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD, while IOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT.NEO achieves a -23.81% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's -3.21% return.
MSFT.NEO
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -23.81%
- 6M
- -29.21%
- 1Y
- -2.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT.NEO
IOO
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFT.NEO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | 1.20 | -1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.03 | 1.73 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.87 | -1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 7.55 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFT.NEO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 1.20 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.93 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT.NEO and IOO is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than IOO's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT.NEO Microsoft Corp CDR | 1.31% | 0.99% | 1.01% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -24.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.NEO and IOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT.NEO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -55.85% | +18.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -12.40% | -21.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.26% | -6.82% | -25.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.80% | -11.34% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.76% | 2.61% | +10.15% |
Volatility
MSFT.NEO vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 6.09%. This indicates that MSFT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT.NEO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 6.09% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 10.74% | +8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.62% | 18.97% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.96% | 15.07% | +11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.96% | 15.91% | +11.05% |