MSFO vs. CVNY
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and CVNY (YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CVNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -4.82% vs -4.57% for CVNY. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFO vs. CVNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly higher than CVNY's -21.78% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -4.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVNY
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -21.78%
- 6M
- -16.35%
- 1Y
- -4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFO vs. CVNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| -9.19% | 17.85% |
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF | -21.78% | 54.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and CVNY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. CVNY — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
CVNY
MSFO vs. CVNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFO | CVNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | -0.13 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | -0.29 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFO | CVNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | -0.09 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.26 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. CVNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, smaller than the maximum CVNY drawdown of -43.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and CVNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | CVNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -43.27% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.29% | -36.27% | +6.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.79% | -29.61% | +12.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -13.43% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 15.93% | -2.77% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. CVNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is 8.28%, while YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a volatility of 13.77%. This indicates that MSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | CVNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 13.77% | -5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 36.83% | -17.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 49.41% | -27.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 58.26% | -38.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 58.26% | -38.48% |
MSFO vs. CVNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFO and CVNY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSFO vs. CVNY - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, less than CVNY's 109.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 109.69% | 80.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| 38.67% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and CVNY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVNY has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to MSFO (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs CVNY's -43.27%.
On 1-year performance, CVNY leads with -4.57% vs -4.82% for MSFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CVNY has performed better with a -4.57% return vs -4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFO and CVNY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 109.69%, compared with 38.67% for MSFO.
MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while CVNY is Derivative Income.
CVNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and CVNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer