MSFL vs. RTXG
MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) and RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFL returned -26.66% vs 65.13% for RTXG. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSFL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RTXG.
Performance
MSFL vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's 26.52% return.
MSFL
- 1D
- 9.72%
- 1M
- 51.15%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- YTD
- -10.77%
- 1Y
- -26.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.78%
RTXG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 26.52%
- 1Y
- 65.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 84.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.00M | $33.79M | $35.34M | |
| $961.72K | $622.33K | $626.49K |
MSFL vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | -10.77% | 1.69% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 26.52% | 60.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFL and RTXG is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFL vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank
MSFL
RTXG
MSFL vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFL | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.24 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.75 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 4.03 | -4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFL vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and RTXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFL | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.08% | -37.49% | -24.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.08% | -37.49% | -24.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.47% | -3.28% | -27.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -10.33% | -13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.36% | 16.21% | +21.15% |
Volatility
MSFL vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 30.67% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) at 17.43%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFL | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.67% | 17.43% | +13.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.19% | 40.50% | +11.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.60% | 51.96% | +11.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 51.13% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 51.13% | +3.53% |
MSFL vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFL vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison
MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 5.03% | 6.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFL and RTXG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFL has higher volatility (30.67%) compared to RTXG (17.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFL dropped -62.08% vs RTXG's -37.49%.
On 1-year performance, RTXG leads with 65.13% vs -26.66% for MSFL. On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 17.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RTXG has performed better with a 65.13% return vs -26.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for MSFL.
RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.00% for MSFL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for MSFL and 0.75% for RTXG.
RTXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFL and RTXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer