PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFD vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFD vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 16.72% return.


MSFD

1D
-2.88%
1M
-18.05%
6M
-11.78%
YTD
-1.78%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
-10.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.36%

SPUU

1D
1.52%
1M
0.24%
6M
14.02%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
23.82%
ALL TIME*
21.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.45M$15.41M$22.03M
$4.20M$4.55M$4.33M

MSFD vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
-1.78%-13.36%-7.86%-35.90%3.88%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
16.72%26.55%44.25%47.28%-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and SPUU is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022

-0.65

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MSFD and SPUU has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.65 to -0.42, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFD vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSFD
MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSFD vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFDSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.85

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

7.47

-6.26

MSFD vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFDSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.90%

-59.35%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.54%

-18.19%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.50%

-35.18%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.70%

-3.83%

-51.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-9.44%

-32.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

4.51%

+3.36%

Volatility

MSFD vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 7.10%. This indicates that MSFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFDSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.10%

7.10%

+11.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.83%

20.38%

+7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.03%

25.88%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.55%

33.70%

-6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.55%

35.79%

-8.24%

MSFD vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFD vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
4.02%3.33%4.46%4.43%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFD and SPUU have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFD has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to SPUU (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 3-year performance, SPUU leads with 31.33% vs -10.70% for MSFD. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 31.33% return vs -10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.

MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.

MSFD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPUU is Leveraged Equities. MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFD and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer