MSFD vs. METD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. MSFD is passively managed, while METD is actively managed. Over the past year, MSFD returned 7.43% vs 1.14% for METD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

MSFD vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than METD's 1.66% return.

MSFD

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: -7.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METD

• 1D: -4.20%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: -1.28%
• 1Y: 1.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFD vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	10.43%	-13.36%	2.29%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	1.66%	-17.33%	-15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and METD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.51

The correlation between MSFD and METD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSFD vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFD

MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 13
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 13

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 10
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFD vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFD	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.03	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	0.29	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.04	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	0.05	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	0.11	+0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFD vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFD	METD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	0.03	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	-0.44	-0.07

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFD	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.90%	-46.03%	-13.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.25%	-24.38%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.20%	-34.66%	-15.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.59%	-28.61%	-12.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.40%	11.35%	-2.95%

Volatility

MSFD vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 8.85%. This indicates that MSFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFD	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.12%	8.85%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.06%	27.02%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.32%	35.57%	-10.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.15%	36.41%	-10.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.15%	36.41%	-10.26%

MSFD vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFD vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than METD's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.69%	3.35%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	2.83%	3.33%	4.46%	4.43%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFD and METD in my portfolio?

MSFD and METD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFD or METD?

MSFD has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to METD (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, MSFD or METD?

On 1-year performance, MSFD leads with 7.43% vs 1.14% for METD. On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFD or METD?

Over the 1-year period, MSFD has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFD or METD?

METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFD or METD?

MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.69% for METD.

What is the main difference between MSFD and METD?

Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.