MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - MSEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for SPOL.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 11.78% return.
MSEA.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPOL.L
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 21.45%
- 1Y
- 40.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 7.55% | 7.48% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.78% | 14.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEA.L and SPOL.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
SPOL.L
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.02 | +1.97 |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -67.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and SPOL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -67.31% | +56.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -3.91% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -41.79% | +39.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 23.38% | -8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 30.63% | -15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 27.33% | -12.15% |
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSEA.L nor SPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEA.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.
MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and SPOL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer