PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOL.L achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than XD5E.L's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOL.L has underperformed XD5E.L with an annualized return of 10.37%, while XD5E.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.


SPOL.L

1D
0.05%
1M
6.06%
YTD
14.98%
6M
24.72%
1Y
44.16%
3Y*
30.21%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
10.37%

XD5E.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.38%
6M
9.46%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.98%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%
XD5E.L
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
7.38%30.59%4.80%16.42%-6.55%14.24%5.09%19.28%-11.50%17.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOL.L and XD5E.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2012

0.58

The correlation between SPOL.L and XD5E.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPOL.L
XD5E.L

Financial Services

48.0%
25.0%

Energy

16.7%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
8.6%

Basic Materials

9.8%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.2%

Technology

2.2%
15.1%

Utilities

2.0%
6.4%

Industrials

1.9%
22.0%

Healthcare

-

6.0%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Financial Services

SPOL.L
48.0%
XD5E.L
25.0%

Energy

SPOL.L
16.7%
XD5E.L
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPOL.L
10.9%
XD5E.L
8.6%

Basic Materials

SPOL.L
9.8%
XD5E.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPOL.L
5.4%
XD5E.L
4.6%

Communication Services

SPOL.L
3.2%
XD5E.L
4.2%

Technology

SPOL.L
2.2%
XD5E.L
15.1%

Utilities

SPOL.L
2.0%
XD5E.L
6.4%

Industrials

SPOL.L
1.9%
XD5E.L
22.0%

Healthcare

SPOL.L

-

XD5E.L
6.0%

Real Estate

SPOL.L

-

XD5E.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XD5E.L
XD5E.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XD5E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD5E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPOL.LXD5E.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

1.91

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

6.80

+4.25

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the XD5E.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOL.L and XD5E.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPOL.LXD5E.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.51

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.60

-0.44

Drawdowns

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOL.L drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than XD5E.L's maximum drawdown of -31.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOL.L and XD5E.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOL.LXD5E.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-31.47%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-10.99%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-12.92%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.27%

-21.76%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.64%

-31.47%

-25.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.64%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-5.02%

-16.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.09%

+0.90%

Volatility

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.L) at 4.65%. This indicates that SPOL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XD5E.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOL.LXD5E.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

4.65%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.30%

11.51%

+5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.18%

13.89%

+9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.10%

16.11%

+10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

16.81%

+8.61%

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XD5E.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPOL.L vs. XD5E.L - Dividend Comparison

SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XD5E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD5E.L
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
2.44%2.51%2.93%2.71%4.42%1.47%2.89%2.65%1.82%2.41%0.68%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPOL.L and XD5E.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XD5E.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD5E.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR, while XD5E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SPOL.L and 0.12% for XD5E.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOL.L and XD5E.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer