MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and LGUK.L (L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - MSEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while LGUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUK.L.

Performance

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than LGUK.L's 5.16% return.

MSEA.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 7.55%
• 6M: 8.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LGUK.L

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 11.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A	7.55%	7.48%
LGUK.L L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF	5.16%	6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEA.L and LGUK.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUK.L

LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSEA.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	0.54	+1.45

Drawdowns

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum LGUK.L drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and LGUK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSEA.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.45%	-33.76%	+23.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-4.41%	+3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-4.81%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSEA.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	14.48%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	13.88%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.31%	-1.13%

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MSEA.L vs. LGUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSEA.L nor LGUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSEA.L and LGUK.L in my portfolio?

MSEA.L and LGUK.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSEA.L or LGUK.L?

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSEA.L or LGUK.L?

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for MSEA.L.

What is the main difference between MSEA.L and LGUK.L?

MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.05% for LGUK.L.