PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LGUK.L vs. ISF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L).

LGUK.L and ISF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGUK.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. ISF.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Apr 27, 2000. Both LGUK.L and ISF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF		5.41%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.26%17.94%-12.15%20.11%-7.13%
ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)		5.53%25.97%9.28%7.81%4.83%17.68%-11.67%17.11%-3.99%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGUK.L having a 5.41% return and ISF.L slightly higher at 5.53%.

LGUK.L

1D
2.29%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
5.41%
6M
10.37%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
—

ISF.L

1D
1.96%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
5.53%
6M
11.73%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF

iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)

Often compared with LGUK.L:
LGUK.L vs. LCUK.LLGUK.L vs. VUGLGUK.L vs. S100.LLGUK.L vs. XASX.LLGUK.L vs. VUKG.LLGUK.L vs. SPYLGUK.L vs. VOO
Often compared with ISF.L:
ISF.L vs. VUKE.LISF.L vs. HUKX.LISF.L vs. XDAX.LISF.L vs. UKDV.LISF.L vs. VUSA.ASISF.L vs. VOOISF.L vs. FEUI.L

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ISF.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
ISF.L
ISF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ISF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ISF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LGUK.LISF.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.87

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.35

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.69

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.37

10.48

-1.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the ISF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUK.L and ISF.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LGUK.LISF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.87

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.03

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.63

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.16

+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between LGUK.L and ISF.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Dividend Comparison

LGUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)		2.88%3.01%3.71%3.86%3.75%3.76%3.11%4.47%4.44%3.96%3.79%4.12%

Drawdowns

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUK.L drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum ISF.L drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUK.L and ISF.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

LGUK.LISF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-68.24%

+34.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-10.57%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.30%

-12.69%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.13%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-4.44%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-21.99%

+17.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.36%

+0.08%

Volatility

LGUK.L vs. ISF.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) at 5.36%. This indicates that LGUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

LGUK.LISF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

5.36%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

8.41%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

13.02%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

12.52%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

14.82%

+1.47%