MSDL vs. SCHD
MSDL (Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past year, MSDL returned -13.06% vs 27.16% for SCHD. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSDL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSDL achieves a -5.04% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
MSDL
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -5.04%
- 6M
- -7.33%
- 1Y
- -13.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
MSDL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSDL Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund | -5.04% | -10.85% | 10.95% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSDL and SCHD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSDL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
MSDL
SCHD
MSDL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.45 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 5.91 | -6.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 14.53 | -15.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 2.49 | -3.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.86 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
MSDL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSDL drawdown since its inception was -29.68%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.68% | -33.37% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.80% | -4.61% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.45% | -1.40% | -20.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -3.32% | -8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.37% | 1.88% | +11.49% |
Volatility
MSDL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that MSDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 2.66% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.16% | 7.66% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 10.96% | +8.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 14.38% | +8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 16.72% | +6.44% |
Dividends
MSDL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
MSDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.87%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSDL Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund | 12.87% | 12.14% | 10.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSDL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSDL has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSDL dropped -29.68% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSDL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer