PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSDL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSDL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSDL
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
-12.50%-10.85%10.95%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-4.42%17.82%22.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDL achieves a -12.50% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return.


MSDL

1D
2.20%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
-12.50%
6M
-7.60%
1Y
-21.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDL
MSDL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MSDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSDLVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.94

0.98

-1.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.31

1.50

-2.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.23

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

1.53

-2.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.84

7.29

-9.13

MSDL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSDL and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSDLVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

0.98

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.83

-1.11

Correlation

The correlation between MSDL and VOO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MSDL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MSDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.97%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSDL
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
13.97%12.14%10.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

MSDL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDL drawdown since its inception was -29.68%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDL and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.68%

-33.99%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.03%

-11.98%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.62%

-6.29%

-21.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-3.72%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

2.52%

+9.46%

Volatility

MSDL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that MSDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSDLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

5.29%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

9.44%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.58%

18.10%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.36%

16.82%

+6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

17.99%

+5.37%