PortfoliosLab logo
MSDL vs. ARCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MSDL and ARCC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MSDL vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSDL:

-0.11

ARCC:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

MSDL:

-0.13

ARCC:

0.82

Omega Ratio

MSDL:

0.98

ARCC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

MSDL:

-0.28

ARCC:

0.54

Martin Ratio

MSDL:

-0.50

ARCC:

2.10

Ulcer Index

MSDL:

10.25%

ARCC:

4.85%

Daily Std Dev

MSDL:

23.85%

ARCC:

20.77%

Max Drawdown

MSDL:

-18.12%

ARCC:

-79.40%

Current Drawdown

MSDL:

-10.34%

ARCC:

-7.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSDL:

$1.70B

ARCC:

$14.99B

EPS

MSDL:

$2.18

ARCC:

$2.04

PE Ratio

MSDL:

8.94

ARCC:

10.58

PS Ratio

MSDL:

9.04

ARCC:

4.96

PB Ratio

MSDL:

0.93

ARCC:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSDL:

$328.50M

ARCC:

$2.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSDL:

$210.64M

ARCC:

$2.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSDL:

$88.35M

ARCC:

$1.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDL achieves a -3.37% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's 0.89% return.


MSDL

YTD

-3.37%

1M

0.83%

6M

0.06%

1Y

-1.16%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ARCC

YTD

0.89%

1M

2.27%

6M

2.52%

1Y

10.75%

3Y*

16.09%

5Y*

18.72%

10Y*

13.00%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ares Capital Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSDL vs. ARCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSDL is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSDL is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSDL is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSDL is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSDL is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSDL is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARCC is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARCC is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARCC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSDL vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MSDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSDL and ARCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MSDL vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

MSDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than ARCC's 8.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MSDL
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
11.29%10.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
8.89%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%10.06%

Drawdowns

MSDL vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDL drawdown since its inception was -18.12%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDL and ARCC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MSDL vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 5.82%. This indicates that MSDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MSDL vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
101.46M
599.00M
(MSDL) Total Revenue
(ARCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items