PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDL vs. BXSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSDL vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDL achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.86% return.


MSDL

1D
-2.67%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
-6.23%
6M
-5.62%
1Y
-12.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BXSL

1D
-1.65%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
-8.86%
6M
-8.91%
1Y
-16.53%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDL vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSDL
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
-6.23%-10.85%11.98%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-8.86%-9.36%24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MSDL and BXSL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.49

Over the past year, MSDL and BXSL have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSDL:

$1.28B

BXSL:

$5.39B

EPS

MSDL:

$1.54

BXSL:

$1.80

PE Ratio

MSDL:

9.70

BXSL:

12.91

PS Ratio

MSDL:

4.14

BXSL:

7.55

PB Ratio

MSDL:

0.76

BXSL:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSDL:

$313.72M

BXSL:

$706.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSDL:

$139.11M

BXSL:

$831.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSDL:

$126.37M

BXSL:

$525.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDL vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDL
MSDL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDL vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSDLBXSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.88

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.71

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-1.04

+0.10

MSDL vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSDL and BXSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSDL vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDL drawdown since its inception was -29.68%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDL and BXSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDLBXSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.68%

-36.80%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.80%

-23.47%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.43%

-22.64%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-14.18%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

15.99%

-2.22%

Volatility

MSDL vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) at 5.32%. This indicates that MSDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDLBXSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

5.32%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

16.51%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.61%

20.26%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

23.82%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

23.82%

-0.63%

Dividends

MSDL vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

MSDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.03%, less than BXSL's 13.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
13.26%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%
MSDL
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
13.03%12.14%10.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSDL vs. BXSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
89.06M
0
(MSDL) Total Revenue
(BXSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSDL and BXSL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSDL has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to BXSL (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSDL dropped -29.68% vs BXSL's -36.80%.

MSDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSDL and BXSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer