MSCFX vs. CSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX).
MSCFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Aug 11, 2011. CSMDX is managed by Copeland Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017.
Performance
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 3.75% | 3.96% | 7.25% | 11.04% | -14.06% | 30.31% | 8.82% | 21.12% | -6.89% | 3.56% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.93% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSCFX having a 3.75% return and CSMDX slightly higher at 3.93%.
MSCFX
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -7.87%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
CSMDX
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSCFX and CSMDX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
MSCFX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCFX
CSMDX
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSCFX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.63 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.05 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.94 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 3.52 | +1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSCFX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.63 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.22 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.41 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCFX and CSMDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison
MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than CSMDX's 3.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 2.19% | 2.27% | 2.17% | 0.67% | 6.48% | 11.25% | 2.04% | 3.11% | 4.78% | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.16% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.02% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and CSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCFX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -37.28% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -13.33% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.65% | -24.60% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.24% | -7.03% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -5.84% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 3.55% | +0.97% |
Volatility
MSCFX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 5.30%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSCFX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 5.30% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 10.48% | +4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.58% | 19.41% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 18.15% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 19.26% | +3.65% |