PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSCFX vs. FDGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSCFX and FDGRX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

MSCFX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-5.94%
-0.44%
MSCFX
FDGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSCFX:

0.05

FDGRX:

0.83

Sortino Ratio

MSCFX:

0.22

FDGRX:

1.17

Omega Ratio

MSCFX:

1.02

FDGRX:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

MSCFX:

0.05

FDGRX:

0.84

Martin Ratio

MSCFX:

0.20

FDGRX:

3.33

Ulcer Index

MSCFX:

4.98%

FDGRX:

5.40%

Daily Std Dev

MSCFX:

19.09%

FDGRX:

21.79%

Max Drawdown

MSCFX:

-44.38%

FDGRX:

-71.50%

Current Drawdown

MSCFX:

-18.58%

FDGRX:

-11.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 3.66%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


MSCFX

YTD

-3.43%

1M

-7.07%

6M

-5.94%

1Y

0.86%

5Y*

2.77%

10Y*

3.66%

FDGRX

YTD

0.07%

1M

-3.97%

6M

-0.44%

1Y

13.85%

5Y*

11.53%

10Y*

11.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSCFX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


MSCFX
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund
Expense ratio chart for MSCFX: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FDGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSCFX vs. FDGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSCFX is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDGRX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDGRX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDGRX is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDGRX is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDGRX is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDGRX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSCFX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSCFX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.050.83
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSCFX, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.221.17
The chart of Omega ratio for MSCFX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.021.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSCFX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.050.84
The chart of Martin ratio for MSCFX, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.203.33
MSCFX
FDGRX

The current MSCFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCFX and FDGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.05
0.83
MSCFX
FDGRX

Dividends

MSCFX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MSCFX
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund
0.08%0.08%0.20%0.17%0.04%0.60%0.43%0.67%0.53%0.32%0.41%0.36%
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%3.92%4.03%

Drawdowns

MSCFX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and FDGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-18.58%
-11.41%
MSCFX
FDGRX

Volatility

MSCFX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) is 4.04%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that MSCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.04%
6.66%
MSCFX
FDGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab