MSCFX vs. HFCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX).
MSCFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Aug 11, 2011. HFCGX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996.
Performance
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 0.35% | 3.96% | 7.25% | 11.04% | -14.06% | 30.31% | 8.82% | 21.12% | -6.89% | 7.64% |
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund | 0.00% | 4.78% | 31.45% | 19.58% | -4.97% | 29.94% | 17.73% | 20.70% | -21.39% | 16.60% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.
MSCFX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
HFCGX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 10.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSCFX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCFX
HFCGX
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSCFX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.57 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.62 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 2.65 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSCFX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.57 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.43 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.37 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCFX and HFCGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison
MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 2.26% | 2.27% | 2.17% | 0.67% | 6.48% | 11.25% | 2.04% | 3.11% | 4.78% | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.16% |
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.11% | 0.38% | 3.58% | 26.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and HFCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCFX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -62.35% | +21.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -13.38% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.65% | -26.30% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | -54.22% | +13.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.19% | -6.56% | -6.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -15.32% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 3.11% | +1.36% |
Volatility
MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) at 4.72%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSCFX | HFCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 4.72% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 9.12% | +5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 18.55% | +6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 24.53% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 25.79% | -2.90% |