MSCFX vs. HFCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSCFX (Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund) and HFCGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX returned 9.21%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for HFCGX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSCFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for HFCGX.

Performance

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MSCFX having a 16.75% return and HFCGX slightly lower at 16.55%. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return.

MSCFX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 16.75%
• 6M: 14.08%
• 1Y: 35.39%
• 3Y*: 12.74%
• 5Y*: 6.43%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

HFCGX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 6.46%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 17.79%
• 1Y: 23.40%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: 12.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund	16.75%	3.96%	7.25%	11.04%	-14.06%	30.31%	8.82%	21.12%	-6.89%	7.64%
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	16.55%	4.78%	31.45%	19.58%	-4.97%	29.94%	17.73%	20.70%	-21.39%	16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCFX and HFCGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2011	0.83

The correlation between MSCFX and HFCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSCFX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCFX

MSCFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MSCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MSCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MSCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MSCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
MSCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

HFCGX

HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSCFX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.78	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.60	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.31	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	2.95	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.00	9.70	+0.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCFX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSCFX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.78	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.56	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.50	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.39	+0.17

Drawdowns

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and HFCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSCFX	HFCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.89%	-62.35%	+21.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.19%	-7.82%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.65%	-22.86%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.65%	-26.30%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.89%	-54.22%	+13.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	0.00%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-15.23%	+8.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	2.37%	+1.48%

Volatility

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) at 4.56%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSCFX	HFCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	4.56%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.98%	9.49%	+5.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.12%	12.96%	+8.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.31%	24.08%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	25.82%	-2.80%

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSCFX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.11%	0.38%	3.58%	26.58%	0.00%	0.00%	10.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund	1.95%	2.27%	2.17%	0.67%	6.48%	11.25%	2.04%	3.11%	4.78%	3.43%	1.90%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSCFX and HFCGX in my portfolio?

MSCFX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSCFX or HFCGX?

MSCFX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to HFCGX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCFX dropped -40.89% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.