PortfoliosLab logo
MSCFX vs. MPGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSCFX and MPGFX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSCFX:

-0.34

MPGFX:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

MSCFX:

-0.38

MPGFX:

0.20

Omega Ratio

MSCFX:

0.95

MPGFX:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

MSCFX:

-0.26

MPGFX:

0.04

Martin Ratio

MSCFX:

-0.79

MPGFX:

0.12

Ulcer Index

MSCFX:

11.74%

MPGFX:

7.42%

Daily Std Dev

MSCFX:

25.34%

MPGFX:

19.26%

Max Drawdown

MSCFX:

-44.38%

MPGFX:

-60.43%

Current Drawdown

MSCFX:

-25.60%

MPGFX:

-10.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a -11.75% return, which is significantly lower than MPGFX's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed MPGFX with an annualized return of 2.90%, while MPGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.56% annualized return.


MSCFX

YTD

-11.75%

1M

3.88%

6M

-19.59%

1Y

-8.65%

3Y*

-1.79%

5Y*

4.21%

10Y*

2.90%

MPGFX

YTD

-3.25%

1M

4.55%

6M

-10.14%

1Y

2.33%

3Y*

7.02%

5Y*

7.16%

10Y*

4.56%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund

Mairs & Power Growth Fund

MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MPGFX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSCFX vs. MPGFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSCFX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSCFX is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MPGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPGFX is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MSCFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the MPGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCFX and MPGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Dividend Comparison

MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than MPGFX's 3.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MSCFX
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund
2.46%2.17%0.67%6.48%8.32%2.05%3.10%4.78%3.43%1.91%1.17%2.15%
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
3.97%3.84%2.34%8.80%8.13%8.81%7.39%8.76%9.47%5.84%7.92%3.37%

Drawdowns

MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum MPGFX drawdown of -60.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and MPGFX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Volatility Comparison

Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) at 5.02%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...