MSCFX vs. MPGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX).
MSCFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Aug 11, 2011. MPGFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Nov 7, 1958.
Performance
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 3.75% | 3.96% | 7.25% | 11.04% | -14.06% | 30.31% | 8.82% | 21.12% | -6.89% | 7.64% |
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | -3.78% | 10.55% | 19.61% | 27.70% | -21.28% | 29.42% | 16.80% | 28.40% | -4.27% | 16.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than MPGFX's -3.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed MPGFX with an annualized return of 8.67%, while MPGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.
MSCFX
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -7.87%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
MPGFX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -3.77%
- 1Y
- 11.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MPGFX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSCFX vs. MPGFX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCFX
MPGFX
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSCFX | MPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.65 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.05 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.07 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 4.17 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSCFX | MPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.65 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.51 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.64 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.31 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCFX and MPGFX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Dividend Comparison
MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than MPGFX's 4.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 2.19% | 2.27% | 2.17% | 0.67% | 6.48% | 11.25% | 2.04% | 3.11% | 4.78% | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.16% |
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | 4.66% | 4.48% | 3.84% | 2.34% | 8.80% | 8.13% | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.76% | 9.47% | 5.84% | 7.92% |
Drawdowns
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum MPGFX drawdown of -61.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and MPGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCFX | MPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -61.00% | +20.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -11.21% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.65% | -25.87% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | -33.08% | -7.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.24% | -6.65% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -14.75% | +8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 2.88% | +1.64% |
Volatility
MSCFX vs. MPGFX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) at 5.80%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSCFX | MPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 5.80% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 9.85% | +5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.58% | 17.89% | +7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 17.29% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 18.07% | +4.84% |