PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. CVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MS vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly lower than CVX's 26.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed CVX with an annualized return of 25.48%, while CVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


MS

1D
-2.12%
1M
-5.48%
6M
12.77%
YTD
20.12%
1Y
53.40%
3Y*
35.16%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
25.48%
ALL TIME*
13.01%

CVX

1D
1.24%
1M
9.26%
6M
16.28%
YTD
26.84%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
18.47%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MS vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MS
Morgan Stanley
20.12%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
26.84%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MS and CVX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2001

0.41

The correlation between MS and CVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MS:

$332.76B

CVX:

$377.75B

EPS

MS:

$11.41

CVX:

$5.57

PE Ratio

MS:

18.48

CVX:

34.06

PEG Ratio

MS:

1.74

CVX:

3.31

PS Ratio

MS:

2.80

CVX:

2.02

PB Ratio

MS:

3.21

CVX:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

MS:

$120.22B

CVX:

$185.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MS:

$69.72B

CVX:

$47.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

MS:

$27.21B

CVX:

$40.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MS vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MS vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.53

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

4.23

+4.98

MS vs. CVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the CVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MS and CVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MS vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and CVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-55.77%

-32.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.83%

-20.81%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-20.81%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-24.95%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-55.77%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

-9.33%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-11.40%

-22.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.82%

7.53%

-1.71%

Volatility

MS vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Chevron Corporation (CVX) at 7.57%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.63%

7.57%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.21%

17.72%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.22%

22.73%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

25.16%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.32%

29.25%

+2.07%

Dividends

MS vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than CVX's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.68%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.90%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Financials

MS vs. CVX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.15B
47.56B
(MS) Total Revenue
(CVX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MS vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Morgan Stanley and Chevron Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
61.8%
9.6%
Portfolio components
MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MS and CVX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to CVX (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs CVX's -55.77%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MS and CVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer