MRVL vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, MRVL returned 40.68%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for NLR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MRVL vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 229.54% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 40.68%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.

MRVL

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 57.18%
• YTD: 229.54%
• 6M: 231.70%
• 1Y: 302.72%
• 3Y*: 64.86%
• 5Y*: 40.49%
• 10Y*: 40.68%

NLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -3.70%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 19.78%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVL vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.	229.54%	-22.82%	83.79%	63.68%	-57.48%	84.62%	80.25%	65.74%	-23.62%	56.89%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-1.81%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and NLR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007	0.38

Return for Risk

MRVL vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVL

MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 97
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVL vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRVL	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.30	0.44	+3.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	0.90	+3.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.10	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.57	0.63	+10.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.42	1.41	+25.01

MRVL vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRVL	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.60%	-65.05%	-26.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.36%	-29.72%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.79%	-30.48%	-30.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.88%	-30.48%	-31.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.88%	-34.35%	-27.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.61%	-25.81%	+14.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.74%	-35.70%	-11.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.52%	13.33%	-1.81%

Volatility

MRVL vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 40.61% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) at 13.73%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRVL	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.61%	13.73%	+26.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.42%	33.75%	+21.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.94%	42.85%	+28.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.82%	29.56%	+32.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.94%	24.22%	+27.72%

Dividends

MRVL vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.	0.09%	0.28%	0.22%	0.40%	0.65%	0.21%	0.50%	0.90%	1.48%	1.12%	1.73%	2.72%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.60%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRVL and NLR in my portfolio?

MRVL and NLR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRVL or NLR?

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to NLR (13.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.