PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. SHUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSK vs. SHUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than SHUS's 9.37% return.


MRSK

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
3.02%
6M
1.86%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*

SHUS

1D
0.58%
1M
1.33%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.27%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSK vs. SHUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
3.02%11.93%2.07%
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
9.37%10.89%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and SHUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024

0.66

The correlation between MRSK and SHUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. SHUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SHUS
SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. SHUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRSKSHUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.41

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

8.56

-1.03

MRSK vs. SHUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SHUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and SHUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. SHUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, roughly equal to the maximum SHUS drawdown of -14.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and SHUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKSHUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-14.09%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-6.95%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.76%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-2.59%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.96%

+0.02%

Volatility

MRSK vs. SHUS - Volatility Comparison

Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) at 3.07%. This indicates that MRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSKSHUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

3.07%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

7.39%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.85%

10.18%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

12.59%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.86%

12.59%

-0.73%

MRSK vs. SHUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SHUS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRSK vs. SHUS - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SHUS's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.36%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
1.26%1.37%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSK and SHUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRSK has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to SHUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs SHUS's -14.09%.

On 1-year performance, SHUS leads with 16.72% vs 14.90% for MRSK. On fees, SHUS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SHUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SHUS has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 14.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHUS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.

SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.36% for MRSK.

They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Syntax Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.65% for SHUS.

SHUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSK and SHUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer