PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MRSK vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MRSK vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
-3.97%11.93%14.62%13.29%-11.86%20.74%3.05%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
8.67%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 8.67% return.


MRSK

1D
1.90%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
-3.97%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*

KMLM

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.01%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MRSK vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRSKKMLMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.27

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.13

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.21

3.31

+3.90

MRSK vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRSKKMLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.39

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.49

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and KMLM is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MRSK vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than KMLM's 4.62% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.39%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.62%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and KMLM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-27.47%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-6.73%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-27.47%

+12.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-15.27%

+9.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-12.73%

+9.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.41%

-0.65%

Volatility

MRSK vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.05%. This indicates that MRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MRSKKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.05%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

7.22%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

9.84%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.64%

14.57%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

14.67%

-2.76%