MRSK vs. CRDBX
MRSK (Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF) and CRDBX (Potomac Defensive Bull Fund) are both funds - MRSK is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toews Corp., while CRDBX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. Over the past 5 years, MRSK returned 8.40%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for CRDBX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MRSK charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for CRDBX.
Performance
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 18.50% return.
MRSK
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- —
CRDBX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 18.50%
- 6M
- 18.57%
- 1Y
- 43.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 5.48% | 11.93% | 14.62% | 13.29% | -11.86% | 20.74% | 13.87% |
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund | 18.50% | 25.36% | 19.91% | 18.44% | -8.21% | 28.08% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSK and CRDBX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MRSK and CRDBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSK vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank
MRSK
CRDBX
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRSK | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 3.19 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 4.48 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.74 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 6.28 | -3.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 20.70 | -10.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRSK | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 3.19 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.83 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.10 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and CRDBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSK | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.70% | -28.12% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -7.13% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.22% | -17.77% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.70% | -28.12% | +13.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -6.59% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.16% | -0.22% |
Volatility
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) is 2.44%, while Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that MRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRSK | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 4.15% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 10.82% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 14.19% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 19.73% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 20.37% | -8.52% |
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRSK vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison
MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than CRDBX's 12.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund | 12.96% | 15.36% | 12.58% | 9.91% | 0.18% | 25.05% | 1.65% |
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.11% | 14.20% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRSK and CRDBX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDBX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to MRSK (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.
CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRSK and CRDBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer