MRSK vs. RPAR
MRSK (Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF) and RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRSK is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Toews, while RPAR is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MRSK returned 7.63%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for RPAR. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MRSK charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RPAR.
Performance
MRSK vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly higher than RPAR's 2.94% return.
MRSK
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.15%
RPAR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 11.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $835.57K | $1.53M | $1.06M | |
| $331.03K | $305.83K | $491.73K |
MRSK vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 6.64% | 11.93% | 14.62% | 13.29% | -11.86% | 20.74% | 15.57% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.94% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 7.56% | 13.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSK and RPAR is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between MRSK and RPAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSK vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank
MRSK
RPAR
MRSK vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRSK | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.47 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 3.61 | +4.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRSK vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum RPAR drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and RPAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSK | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.70% | -30.16% | +15.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -8.10% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.22% | -11.26% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.70% | -30.16% | +15.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.79% | +6.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -11.45% | +7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 3.29% | -1.30% |
Volatility
MRSK vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) is 1.93%, while RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that MRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRSK | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 2.72% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 8.62% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 10.57% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.78% | 12.51% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 12.65% | -0.85% |
MRSK vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRSK vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison
MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than RPAR's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.11% | 14.20% | 4.29% | 0.00% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.44% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRSK and RPAR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPAR has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to MRSK (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs RPAR's -30.16%.
On 5-year performance, MRSK leads with 7.63% vs 0.16% for RPAR. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, MRSK has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MRSK has performed better with a 7.63% return vs 0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.
RPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.35% for MRSK.
MRSK is categorized as Equity Hedged, while RPAR is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Toews and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.51% for RPAR.
MRSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRSK and RPAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer