PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. GMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSK vs. GMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than GMOM's 11.55% return.


MRSK

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.38%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.74%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

GMOM

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.88%
YTD
11.55%
6M
13.63%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSK vs. GMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
5.23%11.93%14.62%13.29%-11.86%20.74%16.42%
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
11.55%20.63%6.75%0.65%-2.82%19.13%11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and GMOM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.51

The correlation between MRSK and GMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

MRSK vs. GMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MRSK
GMOM

Technology

35.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.8%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
1.1%

Industrials

8.2%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.5%

Energy

3.6%
20.7%

Utilities

2.4%
11.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
15.6%

Technology

MRSK
35.7%
GMOM
8.4%

Financial Services

MRSK
12.0%
GMOM
12.0%

Communication Services

MRSK
10.8%
GMOM
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MRSK
10.1%
GMOM
5.4%

Healthcare

MRSK
8.6%
GMOM
1.1%

Industrials

MRSK
8.2%
GMOM
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

MRSK
4.9%
GMOM
3.5%

Energy

MRSK
3.6%
GMOM
20.7%

Utilities

MRSK
2.4%
GMOM
11.0%

Real Estate

MRSK
1.9%
GMOM
2.2%

Basic Materials

MRSK
1.8%
GMOM
15.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. GMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOM
GMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. GMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRSKGMOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.16

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

2.86

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.07

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

12.03

-2.11

MRSK vs. GMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the GMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and GMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRSKGMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.16

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.49

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.49

+0.47

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. GMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum GMOM drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and GMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKGMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-25.03%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-9.57%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

-13.73%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-19.16%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-2.09%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-7.81%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.44%

-0.50%

Volatility

MRSK vs. GMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) is 2.42%, while Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that MRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSKGMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.29%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

11.18%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

13.61%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

14.41%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

12.82%

-0.98%

MRSK vs. GMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOM's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRSK vs. GMOM - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than GMOM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
1.58%3.01%2.16%3.63%2.52%3.42%1.24%2.60%1.90%2.05%1.77%1.88%
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.36%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSK and GMOM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMOM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to MRSK (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs GMOM's -25.03%.

On 5-year performance, MRSK leads with 8.16% vs 7.01% for GMOM. On fees, GMOM is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, MRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MRSK has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GMOM is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.

GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.36% for MRSK.

MRSK is categorized as Hedge Fund, while GMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.96% for GMOM.

GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSK and GMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer