MRSK vs. GMOM
MRSK (Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF) and GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRSK is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toews Corp., while GMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MRSK returned 8.16%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for GMOM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MRSK charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GMOM.
Performance
MRSK vs. GMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than GMOM's 11.55% return.
MRSK
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
GMOM
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
MRSK vs. GMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 5.23% | 11.93% | 14.62% | 13.29% | -11.86% | 20.74% | 16.42% |
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 11.55% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 11.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSK and GMOM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MRSK and GMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
MRSK vs. GMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MRSK
GMOM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MRSK
GMOM
Financial Services
MRSK
GMOM
Communication Services
MRSK
GMOM
Consumer Cyclical
MRSK
GMOM
Healthcare
MRSK
GMOM
Industrials
MRSK
GMOM
Consumer Defensive
MRSK
GMOM
Energy
MRSK
GMOM
Utilities
MRSK
GMOM
Real Estate
MRSK
GMOM
Basic Materials
MRSK
GMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSK vs. GMOM — Risk / Return Rank
MRSK
GMOM
MRSK vs. GMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRSK | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 2.16 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.86 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.07 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 12.03 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRSK | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.16 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.49 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.49 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
MRSK vs. GMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum GMOM drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and GMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSK | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.70% | -25.03% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -9.57% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.22% | -13.73% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.70% | -19.16% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -2.09% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -7.81% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.44% | -0.50% |
Volatility
MRSK vs. GMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) is 2.42%, while Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that MRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRSK | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 3.29% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 11.18% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 13.61% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 14.41% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 12.82% | -0.98% |
MRSK vs. GMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOM's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRSK vs. GMOM - Dividend Comparison
MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than GMOM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.11% | 14.20% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRSK and GMOM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMOM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to MRSK (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs GMOM's -25.03%.
On 5-year performance, MRSK leads with 8.16% vs 7.01% for GMOM. On fees, GMOM is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, MRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MRSK has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GMOM is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.
GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.36% for MRSK.
MRSK is categorized as Hedge Fund, while GMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.96% for GMOM.
GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRSK and GMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer