PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRNY vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRNY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRNY achieves a 73.87% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.48% return.


MRNY

1D
-0.53%
1M
19.78%
YTD
73.87%
6M
58.68%
1Y
67.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.02%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRNY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
73.87%-35.72%-59.32%18.27%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
1.48%4.60%15.18%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MRNY and XRMI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2023

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRNY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRNY
MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRNY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRNYXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.68

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

6.75

-2.57

MRNY vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRNY and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRNY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRNY drawdown since its inception was -82.15%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRNY and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRNYXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.15%

-15.31%

-66.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.53%

-5.02%

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.40%

-0.70%

-62.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.89%

-5.86%

-47.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.26%

1.24%

+15.02%

Volatility

MRNY vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.70%. This indicates that MRNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRNYXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.79%

1.70%

+14.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.77%

4.41%

+34.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.99%

5.50%

+45.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.97%

6.90%

+44.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.97%

6.90%

+44.07%

MRNY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRNY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

MRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.35%, more than XRMI's 12.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
87.35%145.98%178.49%1.75%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.75%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRNY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNY has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to XRMI (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRNY dropped -82.15% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 67.82% vs 8.38% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 67.82% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRNY.

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 87.35%, compared with 12.75% for XRMI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRNY and 0.60% for XRMI.

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRNY and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer