PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXL vs. SLAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MXL vs. SLAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXL achieves a 424.33% return, which is significantly higher than SLAB's 67.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXL having a 16.09% annualized return and SLAB not far behind at 15.96%.


MXL

1D
2.96%
1M
16.99%
YTD
424.33%
6M
409.70%
1Y
658.42%
3Y*
46.90%
5Y*
19.10%
10Y*
16.09%

SLAB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.98%
YTD
67.66%
6M
59.16%
1Y
75.14%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXL vs. SLAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXL
MaxLinear, Inc.
424.33%-11.88%-16.79%-29.99%-54.97%97.41%79.97%20.57%-33.38%21.19%
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
67.66%5.22%-6.09%-2.51%-34.27%62.10%9.79%47.16%-10.75%35.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MXL and SLAB is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2010

0.56

The correlation between MXL and SLAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MXL:

$8.01B

SLAB:

$7.22B

EPS

MXL:

-$1.52

SLAB:

-$1.53

PS Ratio

MXL:

15.65

SLAB:

8.77

PB Ratio

MXL:

15.98

SLAB:

6.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

MXL:

$508.90M

SLAB:

$820.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MXL:

$289.93M

SLAB:

$486.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

MXL:

-$70.54M

SLAB:

-$19.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXL vs. SLAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXL
MXL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SLAB
SLAB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SLAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SLAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXL vs. SLAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXLSLABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.44

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.79

3.10

+21.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

67.14

7.65

+59.49

MXL vs. SLAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXL Sharpe Ratio is 6.26, which is higher than the SLAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXL and SLAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXLSLABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.26

1.28

+4.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.21

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.35

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.09

+0.08

Drawdowns

MXL vs. SLAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXL drawdown since its inception was -88.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SLAB drawdown of -89.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXL and SLAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLSLABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.13%

-89.29%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.81%

-24.37%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.61%

-48.12%

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.13%

-58.99%

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.13%

-58.99%

-29.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.64%

0.00%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-47.03%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.88%

9.86%

+0.02%

Volatility

MXL vs. SLAB - Volatility Comparison

MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) has a higher volatility of 28.83% compared to Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) at 1.66%. This indicates that MXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLSLABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.83%

1.66%

+27.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.78%

43.40%

+37.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.15%

58.97%

+47.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.53%

48.82%

+27.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.50%

45.20%

+20.30%

Dividends

MXL vs. SLAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXL nor SLAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MXL vs. SLAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MaxLinear, Inc. and Silicon Laboratories Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
137.19M
213.50M
(MXL) Total Revenue
(SLAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MXL vs. SLAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MaxLinear, Inc. and Silicon Laboratories Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
59.5%
Portfolio components
MXL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.88M and revenue of 137.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

SLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.00M and revenue of 213.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.5%.

MXL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.21M and revenue of 137.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.

SLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported an operating income of -17.08M and revenue of 213.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.0%.

MXL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a net income of -45.14M and revenue of 137.19M, resulting in a net margin of -32.9%.

SLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a net income of -15.90M and revenue of 213.50M, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MXL and SLAB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXL has higher volatility (28.83%) compared to SLAB (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXL dropped -88.13% vs SLAB's -89.29%.

MXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.26 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXL and SLAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer