PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRAM vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRAM vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 143.00% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -22.33% return.


MRAM

1D
-11.67%
1M
-33.05%
YTD
143.00%
6M
140.41%
1Y
272.11%
3Y*
40.16%
5Y*
27.55%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
1.80%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
-22.33%
6M
-22.85%
1Y
-22.44%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
23.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRAM vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRAM
Everspin Technologies, Inc.
143.00%45.23%-29.31%62.59%-50.80%145.65%-12.55%-6.24%-25.20%-9.53%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-22.33%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAM and MSFT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016

0.29

The correlation between MRAM and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRAM:

$521.76M

MSFT:

$2.78T

EPS

MRAM:

$0.01

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

MRAM:

1.80K

MSFT:

22.27

PS Ratio

MRAM:

9.17

MSFT:

8.76

PB Ratio

MRAM:

7.43

MSFT:

6.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRAM:

$56.94M

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRAM:

$29.33M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRAM:

-$3.33M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRAM vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRAM
MRAM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MRAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MRAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRAM vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRAMMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.86

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

-0.66

+6.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

-1.32

+12.55

MRAM vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAM and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRAM vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRAMMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.28%

-69.38%

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.25%

-33.91%

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.89%

-33.91%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.02%

-37.15%

-29.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.76%

-30.58%

-18.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-21.79%

-43.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.34%

17.08%

+7.26%

Volatility

MRAM vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) has a higher volatility of 38.04% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.34%. This indicates that MRAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRAMMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.04%

11.34%

+26.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.15%

22.94%

+68.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.46%

26.02%

+81.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.98%

26.79%

+50.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.69%

27.09%

+51.60%

Dividends

MRAM vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

MRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRAM
Everspin Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.95%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

MRAM vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everspin Technologies, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
14.87M
82.89B
(MRAM) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MRAM vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Everspin Technologies, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
52.7%
67.6%
Portfolio components
MRAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everspin Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.84M and revenue of 14.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

MRAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everspin Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.72M and revenue of 14.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

MRAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everspin Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -290.00K and revenue of 14.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRAM and MSFT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRAM has higher volatility (38.04%) compared to MSFT (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MRAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRAM and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer