MRAM vs. IGE
MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while IGE (iShares North American Natural Resources ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, MRAM returned 36.41%/yr vs 17.22%/yr for IGE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRAM vs. IGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 207.87% return, which is significantly higher than IGE's 22.98% return.
MRAM
- 1D
- -5.11%
- 1M
- 52.37%
- YTD
- 207.87%
- 6M
- 238.91%
- 1Y
- 396.01%
- 3Y*
- 49.50%
- 5Y*
- 36.41%
- 10Y*
- —
IGE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 22.98%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 43.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
MRAM vs. IGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 207.87% | 45.23% | -29.31% | 62.59% | -50.80% | 145.65% | -12.55% | -6.24% | -25.20% | -9.53% |
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 22.98% | 20.41% | 7.55% | 3.12% | 33.24% | 39.42% | -19.58% | 17.16% | -21.59% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAM and IGE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAM vs. IGE — Risk / Return Rank
MRAM
IGE
MRAM vs. IGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRAM | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.10 | 7.93 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.88 | 19.51 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRAM | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | 2.75 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.30 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
MRAM vs. IGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than IGE's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and IGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAM | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -67.55% | -23.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.25% | -5.54% | -43.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.89% | -19.49% | -38.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.02% | -25.72% | -41.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.08% | -2.86% | -32.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.69% | -18.90% | -45.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.29% | 2.25% | +20.04% |
Volatility
MRAM vs. IGE - Volatility Comparison
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) has a higher volatility of 58.82% compared to iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) at 4.40%. This indicates that MRAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAM | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 58.82% | 4.40% | +54.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.10% | 12.67% | +74.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.99% | 15.98% | +88.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.10% | 22.45% | +53.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.30% | 24.94% | +53.36% |
Dividends
MRAM vs. IGE - Dividend Comparison
MRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.89% | 2.32% | 2.54% | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.92% | 3.34% | 5.55% | 2.68% | 2.11% | 1.66% | 3.08% |
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAM and IGE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRAM has higher volatility (58.82%) compared to IGE (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs IGE's -67.55%.
MRAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRAM and IGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer