PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRAM vs. BOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRAM vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 87.72% return, which is significantly higher than BOAT's 44.44% return.


MRAM

1D
12.75%
1M
-8.99%
6M
58.51%
YTD
87.72%
1Y
183.71%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
25.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.83%

BOAT

1D
-0.44%
1M
12.97%
6M
26.12%
YTD
44.44%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
24.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.71M$1.08M$1.05M
$18.53M$18.78M$103.28M

MRAM vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MRAM
Everspin Technologies, Inc.
87.72%45.23%-29.31%62.59%-50.80%100.35%
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
44.44%22.77%5.97%24.53%6.26%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAM and BOAT is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRAM vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MRAM
MRAM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MRAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MRAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BOAT
BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MRAM vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRAMBOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

4.88

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

13.77

-7.94

MRAM vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAM and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRAM vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than BOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and BOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRAMBOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.28%

-33.94%

-57.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.62%

-11.60%

-59.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.62%

-33.94%

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.62%

-33.94%

-36.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.42%

-0.97%

-59.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-9.50%

-55.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.64%

4.10%

+27.54%

Volatility

MRAM vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) has a higher volatility of 32.39% compared to SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) at 6.47%. This indicates that MRAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRAMBOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.39%

6.47%

+25.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.96%

16.87%

+77.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.12%

20.69%

+92.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.48%

25.05%

+53.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.12%

25.05%

+54.07%

Dividends

MRAM vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

MRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
6.37%8.08%13.89%13.65%13.57%1.36%
MRAM
Everspin Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRAM and BOAT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRAM has higher volatility (32.39%) compared to BOAT (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRAM and BOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer