MRA vs. BUCK
MRA (GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MRA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
MRA vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 6.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.49M | $4.19M | $3.86M | |
| $2.07K | $2.83K | $3.71K |
MRA vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF | -2.10% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRA and BUCK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRA vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
MRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUCK
MRA vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF (MRA) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRA | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 34.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRA vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRA drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRA and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRA | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -5.43% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -0.06% | -4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -0.48% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
MRA vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRA | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.26% | 2.63% | +38.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 3.43% | +37.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 3.43% | +37.83% |
MRA vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRA vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
MRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than BUCK's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.29% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF | 7.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRA and BUCK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MRA.
MRA has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 7.29% for BUCK.
MRA is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MRA and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for MRA and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer