MRA vs. SPIN
MRA (GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
MRA vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPIN
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.07K | $2.83K | $3.71K | |
| $120.29K | $175.49K | $389.73K |
MRA vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF | -2.10% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRA and SPIN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRA vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
MRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPIN
MRA vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF (MRA) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRA vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRA drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRA and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -16.85% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -1.66% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -2.22% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.43% | — |
Volatility
MRA vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.26% | 11.39% | +29.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 14.24% | +27.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 14.24% | +27.02% |
MRA vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRA vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
MRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than SPIN's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF | 7.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.19% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRA and SPIN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MRA.
MRA has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 5.19% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MRA and 0.25% for SPIN.
Find the right allocation for MRA and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer