MPWR vs. LQDA
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) are both stocks. MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, MPWR returned 36.56%/yr vs 87.74%/yr for LQDA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MPWR vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 72.37% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA's 85.27% return.
MPWR
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 72.37%
- 6M
- 59.11%
- 1Y
- 128.65%
- 3Y*
- 47.03%
- 5Y*
- 36.56%
- 10Y*
- 37.72%
LQDA
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 51.06%
- YTD
- 85.27%
- 6M
- 82.52%
- 1Y
- 252.26%
- 3Y*
- 96.59%
- 5Y*
- 87.74%
- 10Y*
- —
MPWR vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 72.37% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | -14.19% |
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 85.27% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | -80.26% | 95.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and LQDA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MPWR and LQDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$76.78B
LQDA:
$6.46B
MPWR:
$13.89
LQDA:
$0.24
MPWR:
112.24
LQDA:
267.21
MPWR:
25.63
LQDA:
20.69
MPWR:
20.88
LQDA:
59.51
MPWR:
$2.96B
LQDA:
$288.07M
MPWR:
$1.63B
LQDA:
$275.77M
MPWR:
$861.78M
LQDA:
$51.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
LQDA
MPWR vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPWR | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 7.12 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.40 | 15.88 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPWR | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 3.74 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.20 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.29 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum LQDA drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and LQDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -93.87% | +21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -35.66% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -46.80% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | -55.36% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | 0.00% | -7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -69.65% | +51.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 16.05% | -7.67% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) is 19.38%, while Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a volatility of 28.47%. This indicates that MPWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.38% | 28.47% | -9.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 47.97% | -11.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.99% | 68.06% | -20.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.40% | 73.62% | -20.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.17% | 85.75% | -38.58% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.43% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
MPWR vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MPWR vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and LQDA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDA has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to MPWR (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs LQDA's -93.87%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and LQDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer