MPRO vs. QVOY
MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and QVOY (Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MPRO is passively managed, while QVOY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MPRO returned 9.93%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for QVOY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QVOY.
Performance
MPRO vs. QVOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than QVOY's 17.87% return.
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
QVOY
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 17.87%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 36.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO vs. QVOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 5.93% | 9.33% | 8.37% | 10.55% | -2.05% |
QVOY Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF | 17.87% | 16.45% | 1.55% | 17.19% | -0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPRO and QVOY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022 | 0.59 |
The correlation between MPRO and QVOY shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MPRO vs. QVOY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MPRO
QVOY
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
MPRO
QVOY
Healthcare
MPRO
QVOY
Technology
MPRO
QVOY
Consumer Cyclical
MPRO
QVOY
Real Estate
MPRO
QVOY
Financial Services
MPRO
QVOY
Consumer Defensive
MPRO
QVOY
Industrials
MPRO
QVOY
Basic Materials
MPRO
-
QVOY
Energy
MPRO
-
QVOY
Utilities
MPRO
-
QVOY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPRO vs. QVOY — Risk / Return Rank
MPRO
QVOY
MPRO vs. QVOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPRO | QVOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.94 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 12.07 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPRO | QVOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.33 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.01 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
MPRO vs. QVOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum QVOY drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and QVOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPRO | QVOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -17.05% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -9.39% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -17.05% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.40% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -3.74% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 3.06% | -1.63% |
Volatility
MPRO vs. QVOY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) is 1.74%, while Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that MPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPRO | QVOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 4.58% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | 12.58% | -7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 15.90% | -9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 14.93% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 14.93% | -5.71% |
MPRO vs. QVOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than QVOY's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPRO vs. QVOY - Dividend Comparison
MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than QVOY's 7.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
QVOY Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF | 7.89% | 9.30% | 10.88% | 6.03% | 0.46% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MPRO and QVOY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVOY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to MPRO (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs QVOY's -17.05%.
On 3-year performance, QVOY leads with 15.66% vs 9.93% for MPRO. On fees, MPRO is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QVOY has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MPRO is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QVOY.
QVOY has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 1.88% for MPRO.
They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Q3. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 1.30% for QVOY.
QVOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPRO and QVOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer