MPRO vs. DDX
MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and DDX (Defined Duration 10 ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MPRO is passively managed, while DDX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MPRO returned 9.90%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for DDX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDX.
Performance
MPRO vs. DDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than DDX's 5.64% return.
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
DDX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO vs. DDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 6.22% | 9.33% | 8.37% | 10.55% | -9.38% | 3.99% |
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 5.64% | 12.02% | 2.93% | 10.48% | -16.19% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPRO and DDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MPRO and DDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPRO vs. DDX — Risk / Return Rank
MPRO
DDX
MPRO vs. DDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPRO | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 2.99 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 11.92 | -2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPRO vs. DDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum DDX drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and DDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPRO | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -21.27% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -4.41% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -6.17% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -7.05% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 1.10% | +0.34% |
Volatility
MPRO vs. DDX - Volatility Comparison
Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) at 1.76%. This indicates that MPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPRO | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 1.76% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.15% | 4.66% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 5.62% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 7.47% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 7.47% | +1.75% |
MPRO vs. DDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPRO vs. DDX - Dividend Comparison
MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than DDX's 3.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 3.37% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.41% | 1.38% | 1.14% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.87% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MPRO and DDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPRO has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to DDX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs DDX's -21.27%.
On 3-year performance, MPRO leads with 9.90% vs 8.43% for DDX. On fees, DDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MPRO has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.
DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.87% for MPRO.
They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 0.25% for DDX.
DDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPRO and DDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer