PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPRO vs. DDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPRO vs. DDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than DDX's 5.64% return.


MPRO

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.09%
YTD
6.22%
6M
6.18%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*

DDX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.65%
YTD
5.64%
6M
5.82%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPRO vs. DDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MPRO
Monarch ProCap ETF
6.22%9.33%8.37%10.55%-9.38%3.99%
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
5.64%12.02%2.93%10.48%-16.19%1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MPRO and DDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2021

0.81

The correlation between MPRO and DDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPRO vs. DDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPRO
MPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DDX
DDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPRO vs. DDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPRODDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.99

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

11.92

-2.86

MPRO vs. DDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPRO and DDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPRO vs. DDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum DDX drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and DDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPRODDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-21.27%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-4.41%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-6.17%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-7.05%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.10%

+0.34%

Volatility

MPRO vs. DDX - Volatility Comparison

Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) at 1.76%. This indicates that MPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPRODDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

1.76%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

4.66%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

5.62%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.28%

7.47%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.22%

7.47%

+1.75%

MPRO vs. DDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPRO vs. DDX - Dividend Comparison

MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than DDX's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
3.37%3.17%3.11%2.41%1.38%1.14%
MPRO
Monarch ProCap ETF
1.87%1.93%1.64%1.40%1.09%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPRO and DDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPRO has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to DDX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs DDX's -21.27%.

On 3-year performance, MPRO leads with 9.90% vs 8.43% for DDX. On fees, DDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MPRO has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.

DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.87% for MPRO.

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 0.25% for DDX.

DDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPRO and DDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer