PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPRO vs. MVFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPRO vs. MVFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than MVFG's 12.12% return.


MPRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.89%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.81%
1Y
12.85%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*

MVFG

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.12%
6M
13.45%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPRO vs. MVFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MPRO
Monarch ProCap ETF
5.93%9.33%5.38%
MVFG
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF
12.12%20.98%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MPRO and MVFG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.61

The correlation between MPRO and MVFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPRO vs. MVFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPRO
MPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MVFG
MVFG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MVFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVFG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MVFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVFG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPRO vs. MVFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPROMVFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.85

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

7.37

+1.62

MPRO vs. MVFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the MVFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPRO and MVFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPROMVFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.51

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.13

-0.39

Drawdowns

MPRO vs. MVFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum MVFG drawdown of -15.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and MVFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPROMVFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-15.34%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-15.34%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.77%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-2.57%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

3.84%

-2.41%

Volatility

MPRO vs. MVFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) is 1.74%, while Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that MPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPROMVFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

3.74%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.02%

11.72%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.64%

18.75%

-12.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

15.39%

-6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.22%

15.39%

-6.17%

MPRO vs. MVFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than MVFG's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPRO vs. MVFG - Dividend Comparison

MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than MVFG's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MPRO
Monarch ProCap ETF
1.88%1.93%1.64%1.40%1.09%0.95%
MVFG
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF
1.92%1.90%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPRO and MVFG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVFG has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to MPRO (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs MVFG's -15.34%.

On 1-year performance, MVFG leads with 28.24% vs 12.85% for MPRO. On fees, MPRO is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVFG has performed better with a 28.24% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MPRO is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for MVFG.

MVFG has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.88% for MPRO.

MPRO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while MVFG is Global Equities. MPRO tracks Monarch ProCap Index, while MVFG tracks Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 1.42% for MVFG.

MPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPRO and MVFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer