PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPLX vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MPLX vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MPLX LP (MPLX) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPLX achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than UTG's 17.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MPLX has outperformed UTG with an annualized return of 15.31%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


MPLX

1D
1.66%
1M
0.66%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.03%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
28.75%
5Y*
24.50%
10Y*
15.31%

UTG

1D
2.23%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
17.89%
6M
20.01%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPLX vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPLX
MPLX LP
10.71%20.54%41.72%22.46%21.09%53.92%-1.79%-8.25%-8.43%9.00%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
17.89%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MPLX and UTG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012

0.25

The correlation between MPLX and UTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MPLX:

$6.16

UTG:

$18.20

PE Ratio

MPLX:

9.22

UTG:

2.31

PEG Ratio

MPLX:

0.64

UTG:

0.01

PS Ratio

MPLX:

3.46

UTG:

7.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

MPLX:

$12.54B

UTG:

$525.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MPLX:

$7.52B

UTG:

$228.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

MPLX:

$6.90B

UTG:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPLX vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPLX
MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPLX vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MPLX LP (MPLX) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPLXUTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.52

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

5.48

+0.44

MPLX vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPLX and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPLX vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPLX drawdown since its inception was -85.72%, which is greater than UTG's maximum drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLX and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPLXUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.72%

-67.77%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-11.59%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-15.03%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-26.54%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.21%

-47.91%

-27.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-2.65%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.91%

-8.73%

-21.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

5.33%

-2.01%

Volatility

MPLX vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MPLX LP (MPLX) is 4.72%, while Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that MPLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPLXUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

6.16%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

13.51%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

17.27%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

16.94%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.63%

21.63%

+9.00%

Dividends

MPLX vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

MPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than UTG's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPLX
MPLX LP
7.36%7.39%7.33%8.65%8.80%11.30%12.70%10.41%8.22%6.23%5.86%4.33%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.70%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Financials

MPLX vs. UTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MPLX LP and Reaves Utility Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.04B
76.73M
(MPLX) Total Revenue
(UTG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MPLX and UTG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTG has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to MPLX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPLX dropped -85.72% vs UTG's -67.77%.

UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPLX and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer