PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTG vs. UTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTG vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTG achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 19.89% return. Over the past 10 years, UTG has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 9.50%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


UTG

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.86%
6M
6.23%
YTD
8.41%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
9.50%
ALL TIME*
10.76%

UTF

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.14%
6M
11.54%
YTD
19.89%
1Y
13.64%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.83M$6.41M$7.57M
$13.12M$11.15M$10.73M

UTG vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
8.41%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
19.89%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%

Correlation

The correlation between UTG and UTF is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2004

0.56

The correlation between UTG and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTG:

$3.52B

UTF:

$2.68B

EPS

UTG:

$22.08

UTF:

$6.79

PE Ratio

UTG:

1.74

UTF:

4.08

PEG Ratio

UTG:

0.01

UTF:

0.03

PS Ratio

UTG:

6.58

UTF:

6.93

PB Ratio

UTG:

0.88

UTF:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTG:

$532.00M

UTF:

$387.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTG:

$478.68M

UTF:

$388.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

UTG:

$2.08B

UTF:

$765.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTG vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTG vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTGUTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.19

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.33

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

2.71

-1.49

UTG vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTG and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTG vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTG drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTG and UTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTGUTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-72.62%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-10.33%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-19.00%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-30.28%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

-52.53%

+4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.48%

-1.32%

-9.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-10.30%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

5.05%

+0.86%

Volatility

UTG vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.33%. This indicates that UTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTGUTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

2.33%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

7.97%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

12.47%

+5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

18.20%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

23.30%

-1.59%

Dividends

UTG vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

UTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than UTF's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.84%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
6.26%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Financials

UTG vs. UTF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reaves Utility Income Trust and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UTG and UTF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTG has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to UTF (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTG dropped -67.77% vs UTF's -72.62%.

UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTG and UTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer