PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPLX vs. PAGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MPLX vs. PAGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MPLX LP (MPLX) and Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPLX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than PAGP's 33.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MPLX has outperformed PAGP with an annualized return of 15.34%, while PAGP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.02% annualized return.


MPLX

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.46%
YTD
9.87%
6M
5.56%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
29.14%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
15.34%

PAGP

1D
0.70%
1M
6.21%
YTD
33.60%
6M
36.96%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
29.22%
5Y*
22.80%
10Y*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPLX vs. PAGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPLX
MPLX LP
9.87%20.54%41.72%22.46%21.09%53.92%-1.79%-8.25%-8.43%9.00%
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings, L.P.
33.60%12.69%23.64%38.09%31.78%28.97%-51.17%0.30%-3.49%-32.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MPLX and PAGP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.56

The correlation between MPLX and PAGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MPLX:

$6.16

PAGP:

$2.23

PE Ratio

MPLX:

9.15

PAGP:

11.03

PEG Ratio

MPLX:

0.64

PAGP:

0.15

PS Ratio

MPLX:

3.44

PAGP:

0.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

MPLX:

$12.54B

PAGP:

$45.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MPLX:

$7.52B

PAGP:

$2.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

MPLX:

$6.90B

PAGP:

$2.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPLX vs. PAGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPLX
MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGP
PAGP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PAGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPLX vs. PAGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MPLX LP (MPLX) and Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPLXPAGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.02

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

8.86

-3.08

MPLX vs. PAGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the PAGP Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPLX and PAGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPLXPAGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.43

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

0.84

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.14

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.01

+0.40

Drawdowns

MPLX vs. PAGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPLX drawdown since its inception was -85.72%, smaller than the maximum PAGP drawdown of -94.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLX and PAGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPLXPAGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.72%

-94.21%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-14.44%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-21.02%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-23.89%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.21%

-88.04%

+12.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-34.35%

+31.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.98%

-57.72%

+27.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

4.92%

-1.64%

Volatility

MPLX vs. PAGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MPLX LP (MPLX) is 5.04%, while Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that MPLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPLXPAGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

6.71%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

13.28%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.63%

18.01%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

27.38%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.66%

41.75%

-11.09%

Dividends

MPLX vs. PAGP - Dividend Comparison

MPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than PAGP's 6.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPLX
MPLX LP
7.42%7.39%7.33%8.65%8.80%11.30%12.70%10.41%8.22%6.23%5.86%4.33%
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings, L.P.
6.48%7.94%6.91%6.71%6.69%7.10%10.65%7.28%5.97%8.88%6.91%9.34%

Financials

MPLX vs. PAGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MPLX LP and Plains GP Holdings, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
3.04B
12.47B
(MPLX) Total Revenue
(PAGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MPLX vs. PAGP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MPLX LP and Plains GP Holdings, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
86.8%
0
Portfolio components
MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 2.64B and revenue of 3.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

PAGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.21B and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

PAGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 922.00M and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.

PAGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MPLX and PAGP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAGP has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to MPLX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPLX dropped -85.72% vs PAGP's -94.21%.

PAGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPLX and PAGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer