PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPBLX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Asset Allocation Fund (MPBLX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPBLX achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 17.17% return.


MPBLX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.71%
YTD
8.06%
6M
8.29%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.05%

BLNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
17.17%
6M
18.61%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MPBLX
BNY Mellon Asset Allocation Fund
8.06%14.74%12.71%14.08%-15.76%16.03%12.29%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
17.17%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MPBLX and BLNDX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.66

The correlation between MPBLX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPBLX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPBLX
MPBLX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MPBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MPBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Asset Allocation Fund (MPBLX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPBLXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.44

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

3.19

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

6.52

-3.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.10

20.94

-8.84

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPBLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPBLX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPBLXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.44

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.06

-0.52

Drawdowns

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPBLX drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPBLX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPBLXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-17.69%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-4.75%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-17.69%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-17.69%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-3.19%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.50%

+0.21%

Volatility

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Asset Allocation Fund (MPBLX) is 2.71%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that MPBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPBLXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

3.02%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

9.51%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

12.72%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

11.66%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

11.75%

+0.44%

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPBLX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPBLX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

MPBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.63%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MPBLX
BNY Mellon Asset Allocation Fund
5.85%6.32%4.50%1.59%11.58%6.64%1.59%7.43%6.78%4.52%2.70%7.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPBLX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to MPBLX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPBLX dropped -34.80% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPBLX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer