PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MP vs. UUUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MP vs. UUUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than UUUU's 4.61% return.


MP

1D
-2.70%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
13.97%
6M
-5.92%
1Y
124.05%
3Y*
38.10%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*

UUUU

1D
1.20%
1M
-28.86%
YTD
4.61%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
178.06%
3Y*
33.73%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
19.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MP vs. UUUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MP
MP Materials Corp.
13.97%223.85%-21.41%-18.25%-46.54%41.19%221.70%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
4.61%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%169.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MP and UUUU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.48

The correlation between MP and UUUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MP:

-$0.53

UUUU:

-$0.41

PS Ratio

MP:

25.37

UUUU:

30.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

MP:

$305.30M

UUUU:

$84.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MP:

$25.30M

UUUU:

$31.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

MP:

$1.52M

UUUU:

-$78.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MP vs. UUUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MP
MP Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MP Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MP vs. UUUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPUUUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.49

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

6.95

-3.02

MP vs. UUUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MP Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the UUUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MP and UUUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPUUUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.88

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.24

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.14

+0.61

Drawdowns

MP vs. UUUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum UUUU drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and UUUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPUUUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-99.64%

+17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.79%

-51.28%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.47%

-61.52%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.99%

-68.70%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.63%

-93.52%

+51.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.62%

-92.65%

+50.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.68%

25.75%

+5.93%

Volatility

MP vs. UUUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MP Materials Corp. (MP) is 22.35%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that MP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPUUUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.35%

25.85%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.12%

66.21%

-15.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.82%

95.27%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.62%

73.23%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.68%

72.54%

+0.14%

Dividends

MP vs. UUUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MP nor UUUU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MP vs. UUUU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
90.65M
35.84M
(MP) Total Revenue
(UUUU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MP vs. UUUU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MP Materials Corp. and Energy Fuels Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
40.1%
Portfolio components
MP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UUUU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

MP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

UUUU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -16.93M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -47.2%.

MP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.

UUUU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MP and UUUU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUUU has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to MP (22.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MP dropped -81.99% vs UUUU's -99.64%.

UUUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MP and UUUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer