MP vs. CAH
Compare and contrast key facts about MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MP or CAH.
Key characteristics
| MP | CAH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.68% | 26.11% |
| 1Y Return | 18.39% | 24.16% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -25.64% | 38.22% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 1.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.12 | 1.45 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.34 | 1.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.11 | 2.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 25.11% | 8.40% |
| Daily Std Dev | 56.88% | 21.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.99% | -61.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -67.18% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| MP | CAH | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.24B | $29.89B |
| EPS | -$0.52 | $5.19 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $184.07M | $224.50B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $68.88M | $7.44B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.30M | $2.76B |
Correlation
The correlation between MP and CAH is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MP vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 26.11% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MP vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MP vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
MP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP MP Materials Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 1.61% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.79% | 4.24% | 2.99% | 2.41% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
MP vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than CAH's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and CAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MP vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 9.20%. This indicates that MP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MP vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities